Wednesday, November 12, 2008

The Global President


Globalization…In Rio they party on the beaches. Obama, Japan: the namesake town celebrates with song and dance. In Sydney jubilant crowds roam the streets. The first global president has been elected. He combines black and white, Christian and Muslim, the US and Africa and Asia.

Globalization is the result of an increasingly connected world. None of the major issues facing us today, from a financial meltdown to global warming, can be solved by a single nation. No company can bring its products to the market without components obtained abroad. Markets are intertwined, operate 24 hours a day and are highly dynamic. A
ripple in one place can become a tsunami in another.

The last months proved again that there is no such thing as a local market. At first Europe thought they could escape the impact of the bottom falling out of the financial markets. Shortly afterwards governments around Europe had to bail out one bank after another. Who would expect that a little island on the edge of the world, called Iceland, would get so affected by frozen markets!!! So get used to it: your world has become bigger, more complex and more interconnected than ever. And this will only accelerate…..

The Bush Doctrine has crashed and burned and the Obama Doctrine of engagement and collaboration has risen out of its ashes, reactivating the American Dream and establishing the USA again as an open place where talent from the whole world can come together, study, innovate and build companies. When my Indian business partner Jerry Rao and I started our company, MphasiS, 50% of the new companies in Silicon Valley were started by people who were born outside the US. After 9/11 it has become harder for foreign talent to study and work in the US. This led to a reverse brain drain back to India and China where the opportunities suddenly looked brighter. With an Obama administration it is expected that the US will again become engaging and innovative by investing in the next generation of ITC, healthcare, biotechnology and green energy innovation.

In 2006 and 2007, 124 countries grew their economies at over 4 percent a year, while countries like Holland grew barely 2%. China and India have dramatically changed the global landscape. China has moved in a mere 20 years from a backwater to a manufacturing powerhouse. You have seen the Olympics. This is only a glimpse of things to come. A country of 1.3B, growing consistently at 10% a year. This is mindboggling. Even India, a country many people still consider to be an oddly curious, overpopulated place full of beggars, snake charmers and gurus, is charging ahead at 8% CAGR. Its companies and managers are among the best in the world. India and China educate the majority of scientists and engineers in the world. There is a sense of self confidence and ambition. The largest infrastructure projects are in these countries. For instance, mobile networks are more sophisticated than those in the West. A cell phone call from Cochin is clearer than one from Connecticut.

In the mean time we are trying to cling on to what we have. We hope that innovation will still come from the western world. Don’t hold your breath; if you’re not educating the people to carry out the R&D you’re not going to innovate. Globalization means new players (BRIC: Brazil, Russia, India, China) on both the economic and geopolitical fronts. Those who have the economic power will have the political power. The US will be busy the coming years to get out of the hole dug by the highly incompetent Bush administration. To quote Fareed Zakaria: we are entering the post American era. Hopefully the USA will find its bearings again under Obama's leadership.



3 comments:

  1. Your entry is well written, and with the classic optimism of a serial entrepreneur. I would add my voice, however, to the many that caution against expecting too much from our new US President. The problems with the economy are very profound, and other problems facing the country (healthcare, wars, focus on divisive issues e.g. abortion and gay rights) defy easy solution. Most worrying to me personally is the still low level of education among the majority of the US population, and the tendency to think in terms of black and white instead of shades of grey, a problem the Europeans seem to have in reverse. And as for the power of the emerging economies, their incredible surge in growth in years past has been highly dependent on US consumption (although internal consumption is obviously an important motor for their continuing potential GDP increase). So I would expect lots of bad news from those corners of the world. Many of those BRICs will prove to be made of sand. But let me, like you, also end on an up note: Others have written off the US in the past, most embarrassingly the Japanese in the early 90’s when their chest-thumping “The Japan that Can” became 15 years of stagnation and deflation. The power of the US is rooted in its ability to tap into the dreams of its populace whose belief in the American dream cannot be shaken, as has been resoundingly proven by the election of this charismatic, multicolored leader. I would strongly recommend Simon Schama’s EXCELLENT EXCELLENT new book “The Future of America – a History” wherein one of the key themes is this American power of hope to translate into action and, among other benefits, startling creation of ideas and wealth.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have ordered the book (second hand because it is not in stock). Fareed Zakaria, the Indian Muslim-born Newsweek columnist, has written a very insightful book that’s cautiously optimistic about the US, the Post-American world. While we are in the middle of a deep recession that may last longer that we all hope, I believe in the regenerative powers of the country. But, I have some concerns too. Obama is supporting a $25Bn bail-out of GM and Ford. These companies spend most of their investments on lobbying to keep legislators away from fuel efficiency standards. They stopped innovating long ago. Should they be rewarded for this? Let them go bankrupt and spend the money on retraining workers and innovation. Tom Friedman: “How could these companies be so bad for so long? Clearly the combination of a very un-innovative business culture, visionless management and overly generous labor contracts explains a lot of it. It led to a situation whereby General Motors could make money only by selling big, gas-guzzling S.U.V.’s and trucks. Therefore, instead of focusing on making money by innovating around fuel efficiency, productivity and design, G.M. threw way too much energy into lobbying and maneuvering to protect its gas guzzlers.”

    ReplyDelete
  3. I find your blog extremly resourceful and insightful. There is a wealth of information to be salvaged from each of the posts that I have read. They translate into mini articles and there is that urge to go back and read them again which is very seldom the case with some mundane blogs. There is precision, line and length and above all a remarkable flow of thoughts. The responses and counter responses in the comments section such as this one make it seem like a discussion group. Keep up the great work and continue to enlighten us...Thanks...Shoba

    ReplyDelete